The Association Between Worker Prosperity And...

Introduction In today s developing world, a great association between the representative and the association is essential. For the association s profitability in each field, representatives ought to be prosperity. The associations opposition for giving best in business is high. Thus, to pick up the upper hand viability of the firm is imperative. This can just be achieved when there is a decent connection between the workers and association. In this exposition, I will depict about the association between worker prosperity and authoritative viability. The five components which are affecting on worker prosperity and giving illustration for every element. Likewise disclose how to execute those variables on representatives to take compelling work from them. Worker prosperity is characterized as that bit of a representative s general wellbeing that they see to be determined basically by work and can be influenced by workplace intercessions in the organisation. (John P. Meyer, 2010)The employee satisfactions depends upon the happiness and working environment of an employee. The fundamental point is that the representative prosperity absolutely relates with emotions, perspectives and impression of the worker about their work and their firm. On the off chance that the worker is content with their occupation and their executive means they get the correct admiration about their position than just the representative can give their best to the organisation (Allisey, 2011). ThisShow MoreRelatedEvaluation Of The Approach On Performance Management1178 Words   |  5 Pageson-going procedure between an administrator and a representative to plan for, create, and assess a worker s work. Moreover, it concentrates on what workers do and how they do i t. In addition, it recognises zones for worker learning and incorporates opportunities to examine and plan for a representative s career improvement. It can be said that performance management is a region of Human Resource management which can possibly make the most noteworthy commitment to authoritative viability and developmentRead MoreThe Problem Of Ineffective Leadership1922 Words   |  8 Pages CAUSES OF THE PROBLEM Ineffective Leadership: Leaders who participate in dishonest practices regularly make an environment of recompense inside of the association that is helpful for deviant worker conduct that parallels that of the pioneer (Trevino and Brown, 2005). Employees will watch the moral judgment of their CEO or overseeing chief and are frequently liable to mirror, regardless of the possibility that such impersonation constitutes acting unscrupulously. Generally, regardless of whetherRead MoreWork Efficiency And Effectiveness Of Hrm2877 Words   |  12 Pagesexecution, besidestalkingtoaltogethergovernments at all stages. It is administration of an association s representatives. HRM is some of the time eluded to just as HR (managementstudyguide, 2016). An organization s HR division is in charge of making, actualizing or potentially regulating methods overseeing representative the department of the group toward its workers.It ismanagingpersons as a combined relationship between administrations besides employees. HR effort in current affiliations is stressed overRead MoreHuman Resource, Imperative For Organizations Essay2040 Words   |  9 PagesA.1. Human Resource, imperative for associations in numerous particular zones, was running from key wanting to the picture of the organization HR. HR individuals in a little organization with experience balanced a scope of administrations gave to representatives, territories where the Human Resources keeps up control can enhance the view of HR in all workers when they accept Workforce HR workers to be viewed as inside customers and administrations on account of that Pre-set.. A Department of HumanRead MoreThe Security And Exchange Commission1985 Words   |  8 Pagesassets, and open utility holding organizations. Their essential worry here is promoting exposure of sensitive data, authorizing the securities laws, and ensuring financial specialists. The viability of the Security and Exchange Commission pivots upon its implementation power. Every year the SEC brings between 400-500 common authorization activities against people and organizations that infringe upon the securities laws. A portion of the common infractions incorporates insider exchanging, bookkeepingRead MoreTraining And Development : Training Essay2666 Words   |  11 Pagesoccupation that an individual right now holds. Instruction: This movement centers upon the occupations that an individual may possibly hold later on, and is assessed against those jobs. Advancement: This movement centers upon the exercises that the association utilizing the individual, or that the individual is a piece of, may share later on, and is just about difficult to evaluate. The stakeholders in preparing and advancement are classified into a few classes. The supporters of preparing and advancementRead MoreHuman Resource Portfolio : Examples Of Challenges Confronting Hr Troughs Essay2211 Words   |  9 PagesHuman Resource Portfolio Example of Challenges confronting HR troughs Cordiality and Tourism Human Resource Managers are the most essential individuals of any organizations. HR Manger is to guarantee that association HR are overseeing well even in the Hospitality and Tourism industry. Human Resource Management is a standout amongst the most essential and one of the hardest obligations of a director since people contrast as far as states of mind, qualities, goal, inspirations and life objectivesRead MoreInternal Parameters When Managing Risk Management Essay3099 Words   |  13 Pagestask force to organize a relative or related words, prosperity and security risk or in crisis, to identify and evaluate a high priority. You threatened the welfare administration and strategy, as well as some pieces of the owner to ensure safety needs help. Internal parameters when managing risk for the Organisation: Roles and Responsibilities: †¢ Please identify philosophy and a breakdown of the fiscal impact of the misfortune of the association, representatives of the wider society, and the natureRead MoreHealth Care Delivery Systems Are Not Exempt From Disparities1985 Words   |  8 PagesInside the confines of the United States, millions of people are not able to enjoy prosperity, wealth, and privilege which remains to be a rare commodity despite our countries inured financial ability. Health is one of the aspects that remain stagnant. Various people with different ethnicities face many of the same health risks, but they also have fears unique to their racial, ethnic, cultural upbringings. To gain an understanding of these modifications and formulation of race responses requiresRead MoreThe Investment Of The Field Of Education5766 Words   |  24 Pagesstudents’ loyalty so as to build strong profitable relationship with students. 1.3 Background, Objectives and Significance of the Study †¢ No research had been carried out showing the relationship between service quality students’ loyalty. †¢ Objective of this study is to examine the relationship between service quality students’ loyalty by analyzing whether tangibility, assurance, reliability, responsiveness empathy affect students’ loyalty. 1.4 Definitions Following are key terminologies that

Washington Crossing the Deleware Free Essays

CROSSING THE DELEWARE HIST101 George Washington saved not only the continental army at the battle of Trenton, but he also saved and breathed new life into the cause of Independence. After knowing seemingly knowing nothing but defeat and hardship for the latter half of 1776, Washington knew that not only he, but the neophyte country known as the United States, needed a miracle. History dictates that he most certainly delivered that miracle and saved the cause, but what were the effects of his victory? What is the importance of his crossing of the Delaware? The crossing at the Delaware river has become over the years, the symbol of American spirit and resolve. We will write a custom essay sample on Washington Crossing the Deleware or any similar topic only for you Order Now Numerous historical evidence indicates the hardships and hazards that accompanied the crossing that fateful December night. But to discuss the effects of the crossing, one must set the stage of events first. In the winter of 1776, General George Washington and his fledgling continental army stood on the precipice of annihilation. After suffering a series of disastrous defeats which resulted in the loss of New York city and it’s surrounding areas, Washington gathered the shattered remnants of his once proud army and retreated across the Delaware river into Pennsylvania. Washington knew that the life of not only his army, but the cause was ebbing away daily, more so with their disastrous string of defeats. With low morale, constant desertion, sickness and hunger facing his men, he also knew that there was one other chief problem which would befall him at the end of the year;the expiration of the soldiers enlistments. [1] When the continentals drove the British troops out of Boston in March of 1776, Washington had seventeen thousand troops under his command. By December of 1776, through not only combat but the attrition of war and what entails with it, he now commanded a mere four thousand seven hundred men. At the end of December when the enlistments for the soldiers ran out, he would be fighting with only twelve hundred men. In a letter that Washington wrote to John Hancock who was residing with the Continental congress in Philadelphia at the time, Washington wrote, â€Å"Ten more days will put an end to the existence of our Army[2]. Washington was not exaggerating when he said this. He had no doubt in his mind that come the end of the year the expiration of enlistments would cause an exodus of his fighting force. Aside from the threat of the ending enlistments, there was also the Hessian mercenary force across the river at Trenton, which Washington had no doubt that the they would cross the Delawa re river once it was frozen over and suitable to do so. Washington also realized that if he could end the year with a tremendous victory, it would do wonders not only for the cause, but for recruiting more soldiers to fight for it. With nothing to lose and everything to gain, Washington decided that he would attack the Hessian mercenary force on December 25, 1776. The Hessians were feared by the continental army, and rightfully so. They were some of the Europe’s best trained troops at the time and the memories of their massacre of American troops at the Battle of Long Island, lay fresh in their minds. The need for self-preservation seemed almost as strong as the need to avenge the brave soldiers lost. Washington’s staff strongly advised him from attacking the Hessians in broad daylight, even crossing the river it’s self. Their seemed to be a prevalent feeling that the Hessians would destroy the continentals, even though they had the Hessian’soutnumbered(the Hessians in Trenton were around fifteen-hundred men). While the continentals had numbers on their side, the Hessians had several things they did not. The Hessians were billeted in houses no doubt with fire places and were relatively safe and comfortable from the cold. The Hessians were also no doubt well fed and well cared for. On the contrary, the continental soldier at the time had barely any adequate provisions at all. They were ill fed and ill equipped to face not only the Hessians but the driving winter which was upon them. Most of them wore no shoes, if any shoes at all. On the night of the crossing a major, John Wilkinson, had seen spots of red in the snow, â€Å"tinged here and there†, he wrote, â€Å"with blood from the feet of men who wore broken shoes. †[3] Washington had also lost a significant number of weapons and material during the retreat across the Delaware. Taking over the Hessian garrison in Trenton would not only be a good psychological boost for his troops, but it would also be a start in obtaining much needed supplies for them as well. On Christmas night 1776, Washington assembled his army to cross the Delaware. Several writings on that fateful evening indicated the hardships and perils of the crossing itself. Thomas Rodney who was there that night described it as, â€Å"It was a severe night as I ever saw. The frost was sharp, the current difficult to stem, the ice increasing, the wind high, and at eleven it began to snow. † When the continentals cross the Delaware, all accounted for and behind schedule, they began their march onto Trenton, New Jersey. John Greenwood, a fifer in the Continental Army described the march. What I suffered on the march, cannot be described. They who were with us know best about these things, others cannot believe the tenth part, so I shall say nothing further. 3† Exhausted, starving, frightened and freezing, the Continentals commenced battle with the Hessian at Trenton around eight in the morning, catching most of the Hessian unaware, most of which were still sleeping. Fr om the start of the engagement, the continentals were fully in control of the tempo of the battle and seized the initiative. The Hessians became completely surrounded and their units became isolated and they were forced to surrender. They also suffered heavy losses with twenty-two men dead, eighty three wounded, and nearly one thousand and one hundred troops captured by the Americans. The American’s only suffered two dead and five wounded. (statistics differ to a varying degree on the casualties and material obtained by Washington and his men). Washington had originally planed to march the army further to Princeton and New Brunswick, but after consideration and discussion from his staff, dropped the plan. He ordered his troops to recross the Delaware, where they took back with them not only the Hessian prisoners, but much needed quipment and supplies needed to sustain his army. The battle despite its seemingly small proportion increased not only morale among the men which had been dangerously low to begin with, but also their confidence. They had defeated one Europe, even one of the world’s most respected troops at the time. Despite the victory and the bold gamble it was, there was still the issue o f the expiration of enlistments. Washington seized the advantage and the boost the victory had given him, and two days after the battle, only a few days before the expiration, implored his exhausted, underfed and underpaid troops to stay longer. Fifty years after, a sergeant whom was present at the time gave his account of what Washington said to a group of soldiers. â€Å"My brave fellows, you have done all I asked you to do, and more than could be reasonably expected. But your country is at stake, your wives, your houses, all that you hold dear. You have worn yourselves put with fatigues and hardships, but we know not how to spare you. If you will consent to stay but one month longer, you will render that service to the cause of liberty, and to your country, which you probably can never do under any other circumstances. The present is emphatically the crisis that will decide our destiny. †3 Before this gambit, there were some members of the Congress and even Washington’s own soldiers and staff whom questioned his military ability and handling of the army. The victory at Trenton, and later at Princeton, quelled these fears. Faith was not only renewed in him, but also in his army. The victory also had a tremendous effect upon morale not only within the troops but in Congress as well. The victory also broke the psychological hold that the Hessians had over the continentals as well. They knew now and full realized that they were a capable army as any in the world. The defeat of the Hessians also caused the British to abandon their efforts of protection to the loyalist leaning peoples of New Jersey. When looking at the crossing of the Delaware and the victory at Trenton on a tactical scale, it seems to be a minor engagement. But the significance and the psychological impact, saved the not only the continental army, but it pulled the cause out of the depths of a sea of despondency and defeat. Over the years the American people have come to see the crossing of the Delaware, as a symbol of American resolve, and that we as a people will never give into tyranny and oppression. Bibliography 1. â€Å"The Continental Army†, http://www. history. army. mil/books/RevWar/ContArmy/CA-05. htm 2. â€Å"George Washington Papers at the Library of Congress†, last modified Feb-16-1999, http://memory. loc. gov/ammem/gwhtml/gwhome. html 3. â€Å"Washington Crossing Historical Park†, http://www. ushistory. org/washingtoncrossing/history/revwartimeline. htm ———————– 1]â€Å"The Continental Army†, http://www. history. army. mil/books/RevWar/ContArmy/CA-05. htm [2]â€Å"George Washington Papers at the Library of Congress†, last modified Feb-16-1999, http://memory. loc. gov/ammem/gwhtml/gwhome. html [3]Washington Crossing Historical Park†, http://www. ushistory. org/washingtoncrossing/history/revwarti meline. htm 3Washington Crossing Historical Park†, http://www. ushistory. org/washingtoncrossing/history/revwartimeline. htm 3Washington Crossing Historical Park†, http://www. ushistory. org/washingtoncrossing/history/revwartimeline. htm How to cite Washington Crossing the Deleware, Essay examples

Business and Corporation Law of Contract

Question: Discuss about the Business and Corporation Law of Contract. Answer: Introduction: An agreement has been made between Jane and Jack in the Case Study where Jane has decided to sell her Lotus Super 7 Sports Car to Jack. Jane requires money to go overseas and this is the reason why she wants to sell her Sports Car. The car was in good condition although it is used by Jane. The offer has been accepted by Jack who has been made by Jane. Offer, acceptance, consideration and contractual invitation are the four basic elements of an English Contract Law. These elements have to be present when a contract is made in order to make the contract valid. Jane has made an offer to Jack and Jack has accepted the offer (McKendrick, 2014). The cases are described below according to the IRAC method. Issues According to section 9 of the contract law, an agreement has been made between two parties but although the market value of the Lotus Super 7 Sports Car is mentioned but the price of the sports car is not mentioned. The amount has not been stated by the offeror to the offeree. It is also not stated if the contract between Jane and Jack is in online, oral or in written form. Jack has accepted the offer without the knowledge of the price of the car. When each party in a contract receives something of value, is known as consideration. Consideration is applicable if it movers to the offeror and consideration which is made is sufficient. It is stated that the market value of the Lotus Super 7 Sports Car is $25000 but the price at which Jane sells her sports car to Jack has not been stated. Giving an advertisement properly is essential in an offer but it is not defined whether the contract is in good condition (Beale et al., 2010). Therefore there is a restricted method in which the contra ct took place. The issue is that the amount at which Jane has offered to sell her sports car to Jack has not been stated in this case. Jane offered to sell her sports car at the same rate as the market price which is $25000. The sports car has been used by Jane and therefore it is sold at a second hand rate. There has been an obligation of Jane according to the article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (Hunter, 2015). According to this law, the price of a second hand object should be lesser than the market price. Acceptance has been made by Jack but the rate of the sports car is not lesser than the market price although it is a second hand product. There is a contractual invitation but the advertisement given by Jane is inappropriate. So there is an issue or obligation in this case as the Uniform Commercial Case is not followed in this case (Graw, 2012). Jane sells the Lotus Super 7 Sports Car to Jack for $2500. The market value of the Lotus Super 7 Sports car is $25000. So Jane is selling the Sports car at a very less price. Therefore she runs a loss. The contract is enforced when consideration is appropriate and there is profit on the part of the offeror according to the contract law. All the elements of the contract must be applied in order to enforce the contractual agreement. The main issue in this case is that Jane who is the offeror is running a loss. Rules The terms of the contract requires to be expressed clearly according to section 9 of the Contract Law but the price of the Lotus Super 7 Sports Car has not been stated by Jane in the agreement. There is contractual invitation but there is no consideration from the offeror to the offeree. Therefore there is a breach in selling the goods according to section 7 of the Contract Law. Jack has accepted the offer without the knowledge about the price of the sports car (Anson et al., 2010). The question may arise on expressive terms and Jack may ask about the price of the sports car according to consumer rights. According to article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Jane cannot keep the same price of a second hand sports car to that of the market value. The sales of goods are not proper and obligation on the part Jane who is the seller has taken place in this case. Therefore there is a breach in the article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Jane runs a loss because she sells the sports car at a very less price. This is because she does not know the estimation of the market value and the method of Sales of goods. Jane has not followed section 52 and section 54 of the property act 1925. (Furmston, Cheshire, Fifoot, 2012) There is also a breach in the section 12 and section 15 of the Sales of Goods Act in this contract and the seller has suffered a loss as she fixed the price of the sports car at a very less price which is $2500 when she bought it at $25000 as this is the market value of the sports car. Application The rules of section 7 and section 9 of the sales of goods act should not be breached in order to solve the problem in this case. Jane requires stating the value of the sports car clearly in order to make a valid agreement to Jack. There is a contractual invitation as the offer is accepted by Jack. But there is no consideration because the method of agreement and the value of the sports car are not stated by Jane and Jack has accepted the offer without the knowledge of the price of the sports car. The issue could be solved by following the sales of goods act and the commercial code rules and Jane requires studying the market value of the Lotus Super 7 Sports Car before she fixes the price of the sports car in order to solve the issue (Koffman, Macdonald, 2010). She should fix the price of the sports car at a lower price than the market value of the sports car then the issue would be solved. This issue in this case could be solved by the solution to the sales of goods act and the property act. Jane requires studying the market value of the Lotus Super 7 Sports Car to make the contract properly and should increase the price of the sports car so that she does not run a loss and should fix the price of the sports car according to the Property Act 1925. The Property Act 1925 has the rules which are stated about fixing the price of second hand property or material (O'Sullivan Hilliard, 2016). Conclusion Rules of the contract law have not been followed in the cases while making an agreement. There is a breach of the rules of the UK contract law in these cases. A solution to the breach of the rules of contract law should be organised legally for solving the cases. There are all the elements of a contract including offer, acceptance, consideration and contractual invitation (Burrows, Todd, Finn, 2012). All the rules of the contract is clearly described above which are required in applying the contract for making a valid agreement between the parties and consideration should take place in these cases. A contract took place between the Ship builder (manufacturer) and a tanker company North Ocean Tankers. Here a deal took place between the manufacturer and the customer. The negotiation or contract took place as per regulations of United States (Anson, et al. 2008). The contract formation was void and all the elements of the contract were present in this agreement but conflict occurred when US government devalued 10% currency of US. Whenever currency rises, it becomes problematic for the economist or business man of the country. So, the North Ocean Tankers also became the victim of this problem, when the Ship builder demands extra US$3 million from the North Ocean Tankers for constructing tankers. The seller or manufacturer demanded more money because he was running loss economically and as per his concept he was losing his time. The North Ocean Tankers had to agree because the delivery of tanker was very essential in time. After delivery of 9 months of the product, the North Ocean T ankers did not pay the money of the Ship builder which is misrepresentation. The North Ocean tankers was making astray to the ship builder by falsification and stretching more time. This scenario have some problems which solved by applying several legal rules and regulation following the IRAC method in the consequences described below. Issues As per US law, the agreement was void and proper at first but issue aroused when the government of United States devalued 10% currency of the country. The devaluation gave negative effect to the industrialization where the industries like North Ocean tankers started running economic loss and the manufacturer like Ship builder also started suffering manually and running loss economically. On that perspective, the manufacturer demanded extra charge of US$3 million. As a promisor, the North Ocean Tankers accepted the demand because of the urgent requirement of the delivery. To pay the money, the company needs financial strength but North Ocean Tankers was running economical loss because of the devaluation of currency. In this context the buyer is the promisor and the seller is the promisee. The promisor promised that they will pay extra charge to the promisee in time but the time extended after delivery but the promisor fail to pay the money to the promisee (Elliott, et al. 2007). But a s they has made false promise and misrepresentation, so in this case the promisee (Ship builder) can sue the North Ocean Tankers (Promisor) for breaching the terms of the contract and for taking the delivery by straying him on false promise of providing money in time. Rules A contract as per negotiation between two parties took place in terms of US regulation that follows the rules of Federal arbitration act. At first a contract took place between the company and the manufacturer for constructing a tank, and then when the currency devalued, again a new agreement took place but problem aroused because that agreement clause was not stated in the contract (Federal Arbitration Act at 80, 2004). It is necessary that when anything is reviewed or added in a contract the rules of Contract review act should be followed in that case. As per that act new contract papers should be made where the rules and regulations and new clauses of the agreement should be added. As second agreement was made between the Ship builder and the North Ocean tankers, so as per English law the clause of increment of extra charge delivery to the ship builder should be mentioned in the new contract paper. All these are the loopholes of the contract. The promisor (North Ocean Tankers) vio lated the rules of negotiation by extending time for paying money to the promisee. Breach of negotiation took place in this case. The promisee can file case against the promisor for breaching the promise and if he takes the case to English court then the behaviour will be termed as Unconscionability (Kennedy, 2010). The ship builder can sue the North Ocean Tankers in perspective of Misrepresentation act 1967. As the promisor has did false promise to the promisee that he will pay the money to him after delivery but after 9 months of the product delivery the money is not paid to the promisee (Misrepresentation [H.L.], 2007). Even breach of Federal arbitration act has also taken place here. So the Ship builder has right to sue him to the court. Application In this case the manufacturer (Ship builder) runs loss and punitive dispute occurred in this case. Here the extra wages has not been delivered to the ship builder in time. So remedy should be applied in this case. The ship builder can whether sue the company under misrepresentation act or use remedy like reinstitution and cancellation to solve the case and claim the money from the North Ocean Tankers (Misrepresentation [H.L.], 2007). It is necessary that some remedies should be applied through which the company can rescue themselves. The company is going through financial loss because of the fall of the currency of United States (Emerson, 2004). Their economic condition is not stable, so they are unable to deliver the extra charge to the Ship builder in time. This is the main reason that they are taking more time to pay their debt. In this case as per rules of US government, the company can take help of the English law and apply Bankruptcy act 1966 (Nichols, P, 2012). As per this act, the company has to give proof of their bankruptcy and if the appeal of the company is granted then, the court will give 6 months time to pay the debt to the promisee and till that time the promisee (ship builders) has to wait for the money. This is the only remedy which can help the North Ocean Tankers company to rescue from these severe problems from the Ship builder in perspective of US law. Conclusion A negotiable contract took place between the manufacturer and the customer. The contract is negatively affected in this case. This affected both the promisor and promisee and both are in false position enhancing wrong result of the agreement formation. When external clause was added in the contract, it changed the contract and both promisor and promisee has lost financially (Anson, et al. 2008). In this case the contract took place under Federal arbitration act of US, but when extra clauses were added, contract review does not take place. Breach of negotiation occurred and falsification of promise occurred which can be punishable under misinterpretation act but as the promisor is running economic loss, so he can take the help of US government for remedy and through bankruptcy act he can be rescued from court under US law. This assignment can be concluded by showing these remedy which can solve the problem. References: Anson, W. Huffcut, E. (2008). Principles of the English law of contract (3rd ed.). New York: Banks Law Pub. Co. Anson, W. R., Beatson, J., Burrows, A. S., Cartwright, J. (2010). Anson's law of contract. Oxford University Press. Beale, H., Tallon, D., Vogenauer, S., Rutgers, J. W., Fauvarque-Cosson, B. (2010). Cases, materials and text on contract law. Hart. Burrows, J. F., Todd, S. M., Finn, J. (2012). Law of contract in New Zealand. LexisNexis NZ. Elliott, C. Quinn, F. (2007). Contract law. Harlow: Pearson Longman. Emerson, R. (2004). Business law. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Barron's. Federal Arbitration Act at 80. (2004). New YorK?. Furmston, M. P., Cheshire, G. C., Fifoot, C. H. S. (2012). Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston's law of contract. Oxford University Press. Graw, S. (2012). An introduction to the law of contract. Hunter, H. (2015). Modern Law of Contracts. Kennedy, G. (2010). Negotiation. London: Profile. Koffman, L., Macdonald, E. (2010). The law of contract. Oxford University Press. McKendrick, E. (2014). Contract law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press (UK). Misrepresentation [H.L.] A bill intituled an act to amend the law relating to innocent misrepresentations and to amend sections 11 and 35 of the Sale of Goods Act 1893. (2007). Cambridge [England]. Nichols, P. (2012). Bankruptcy Act 1966. Chatswood, N.S.W.: LexisNexis Butterworths. O'Sullivan, J., Hilliard, J. (2016). The law of contract. Oxford University Press.